What is the issue in
education you wish to address?
What are the effects of electronic textbooks on high school student
achievement? I may refine my
question to a specific assessment such as a state-wide end-of-course exam, the
ACT, or one of the tests on the ACT.
Describe the personal
significance of this question to you.
Personally, I learn better on my own at first. I like to be able to read through some
content, watch a short video clip, try a simulation, highlight/mark passages
that I find interesting or have a question about, and annotate the text. When compared to a traditional high
school classes, I think electronic textbooks can provide a richer experience. Students are usually not allowed to
highlight or annotate their textbooks.
They can use sticky notes, but it is not the same.
Describe the
practical significance of this question.
For whom else besides yourself might this question be significant?
Teachers, principals, and district administrators might find
my question significant. All three
of the parties want to increase student achievement. Principals and district administrators might be particularly
interested in the question if the price is substantially higher or lower than
traditional paper textbooks. They
also might be interested if they have money that has to be spent on technology
hardware. They might be able to
purchase computers, iPads, or other tablets with the technology money, and then
spend nothing or less than they are used to spending on electronic textbooks.
What have others said
about the issue?
I was surprised to find that there has been a lot of
research surrounding electronic textbooks. I was not sure if this would be the case, since I had
assumed that electronic textbooks were a recent idea. It turns out they have been around for over a decade. The downside is that there really was
not any research around modern electronic textbooks utilizing Apple’s new
iBooks application.
An interesting article (though it is quickly becoming
outdated) looked at 11-12 year olds in England that were used to using
computers. The control group used
a traditional textbook, while the test group used a CD-ROM (see, the article is
showing its age!). These
particular sixty students were chosen because they were used to using
computers, so the novelty of using an electronic textbook should be minimized
(Maynard, 2005).
A serious limitation of the study is that the two groups of
students did not use identical textbooks.
The author mentions that it was very difficult to find identical copies
or anything. At the end of the
study, she found that students using the electronic textbooks performed better
than their peers, but not statistically significantly better. I would love to see a similar study
done today comparing two identical titles. The electronic textbooks today have movie clips and
simulations embedded in them.
Vocabulary words are hyperlinked.
Instead of the occasional pictures on pages, students can flip through
slideshows showing similar or contrasting ideas—without leaving the page. Students can highlight, annotate, and
bookmark whatever they want.
In another article, I read about a Texas initiative to move
towards electronic textbooks. The
state is purchasing the electronic books.
Schools can then either print them for their use, or access them online. Schools can use money that would have
otherwise been spent on books, as well as other money, on the technology
hardware. This article did not talk
about any findings. I found it
interesting because it addressed the fact that schools can save money that had
been earmarked for textbooks, and put it into updating hardware. (Radcliffe,
2010)
No comments:
Post a Comment